<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BigSmoke &#187; ImageMagick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bigsmoke.us/tag/imagemagick/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us</link>
	<description>Smokes your problems, coughs fresh air.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Removing unwanted grey values in scanning white papers</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/09/20/removing-unwanted-grey-values-in-scanning-white-papers</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/09/20/removing-unwanted-grey-values-in-scanning-white-papers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>halfgaar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ImageMagick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bigsmoke.us/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
When doing automated scanning, like I do to for properly organizing paper administration, the resulting images can get quite large because the background has near-white information that is still very complex to save. Imagemagick has nice solution for that; <tt>-white-threshold x%</tt>. It also has <tt>-black-threshold</tt>, should it be necessary.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/09/20/removing-unwanted-grey-values-in-scanning-white-papers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ImageMagick can convert PDF to anything</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/02/03/imagemagick-can-convert-pdf-to-anything</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/02/03/imagemagick-can-convert-pdf-to-anything#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rowan Rodrik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghostscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ImageMagick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bigsmoke.us/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encountered one of those scans which was shared as a single-page PDF. I don&#8217;t want it that way, because I want to include it in a web page. I want a simple bitmap image. ImageMagick comes to the rescue:</p>

<pre>convert scan.pdf scan.jpg</pre>

<p>If the resolution this produces is too low for you, try telling Ghostscript (which ImageMagick uses internally) that you want a different density:</p>

<pre>convert -density 300 scan.pdf scan.jpg</pre>

<h2>Attribution</h2>

<p>Googling <q><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=linux+pdf+to+jpg">linux pdf to jpg</a></q> produced two useful results:</p>

<ol>
  <li><cite><a href="http://www.medicalnerds.com/batch-converting-pdf-to-jpgjpeg-using-free-software/">Batch converting PDF to JPG/JPEG using free software</a></cite></li>
  <li><cite><a href="http://linuxondesktop.blogspot.com/2008/05/converting-pdf-to-pngjpg-using.html">Converting PDF to PNG/JPG using ImageMagick in Linux</a></cite></li>
</ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/02/03/imagemagick-can-convert-pdf-to-anything/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

