<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BigSmoke &#187; du</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bigsmoke.us/tag/du/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us</link>
	<description>Smokes your problems, coughs fresh air.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Samba rounds filesizes off to whole MB&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/10/20/samba-rounds-filesizes-off-to-whole-mbs</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/10/20/samba-rounds-filesizes-off-to-whole-mbs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>halfgaar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[du]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bigsmoke.us/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
I noticed when I did &#8216;du -hs&#8217; on a sambamount, I got a disk usage that was unrealistically high. I did some research, and it appears that <a href="http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-September/037240.html">Samba rounds off file sizes to whole MB units</a>, to optimize for windows clients:
</p>

<blockquote>
<p>
<blockquote>
<p>
And btw, why is samba rounding the minimum size up to 1MB ?
</p>
<blockquote>

An optimisation for Windows clients. If we do this they allocate actually
run faster against a Samba server (based on tests done by a NAS vendor).

</p>
<blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2009/10/20/samba-rounds-filesizes-off-to-whole-mbs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

