<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matriux, a penetration testing and security analysis LiveCD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2010/02/01/matriux-livecd-distribution-for-security-analysis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2010/02/01/matriux-livecd-distribution-for-security-analysis</link>
	<description>Smokes your problems, coughs fresh air.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:03:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: halfgaar</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2010/02/01/matriux-livecd-distribution-for-security-analysis#comment-91417</link>
		<dc:creator>halfgaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bigsmoke.us/?p=1150#comment-91417</guid>
		<description>I wonder how it compares to Backtrack. I&#039;m told that Backtrack includes a lot of proprietary stuff, like firmwares, to be able to do passive scanning on certain network cards. Matriux is purely open source, so things like that would be impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how it compares to Backtrack. I&#8217;m told that Backtrack includes a lot of proprietary stuff, like firmwares, to be able to do passive scanning on certain network cards. Matriux is purely open source, so things like that would be impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

