<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unique constraints and indexes in PostgreSQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2007/02/02/postgresql-unique-constraints-and-indexes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2007/02/02/postgresql-unique-constraints-and-indexes</link>
	<description>Smokes your problems, coughs fresh air.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:03:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rowan Rodrik</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2007/02/02/postgresql-unique-constraints-and-indexes#comment-87884</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowan Rodrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2007/02/02/postgresql-unique-contraints-and-indexes#comment-87884</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon,

Rereading the documentation part which I quoted in my post, I am inclined to conclude that you&#039;ve stumbled upon a bug in either PostgreSQL or pgAdmin.

Maybe take it to the mailing list?

Here&#039;s how a unique constraint shows in my version of pgAdmin:

&lt;img src=&quot;http://blog.bigsmoke.us/uploads/2007/02/pgadmin3-unique-constraint.png&quot; alt=&quot;Unique constraint in pgAdmin III&quot; title=&quot;Unique constraint in pgAdmin III&quot; width=&quot;830&quot; height=&quot;700&quot; class=&quot;size-full wp-image-878&quot; /&gt;

Thanks for your interest in my old blog post,
Rowan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>Rereading the documentation part which I quoted in my post, I am inclined to conclude that you&#8217;ve stumbled upon a bug in either PostgreSQL or pgAdmin.</p>
<p>Maybe take it to the mailing list?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how a unique constraint shows in my version of pgAdmin:</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.bigsmoke.us/uploads/2007/02/pgadmin3-unique-constraint.png" alt="Unique constraint in pgAdmin III" title="Unique constraint in pgAdmin III" width="830" height="700" class="size-full wp-image-878" /></p>
<p>Thanks for your interest in my old blog post,<br />
Rowan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2007/02/02/postgresql-unique-constraints-and-indexes#comment-87866</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bigsmoke.us/2007/02/02/postgresql-unique-contraints-and-indexes#comment-87866</guid>
		<description>Rowan,

Comment on a very old post...

I have the opposite situation. From within pgAdmin, I can see a unique constraint, but *not* a unique index. However, it seems the constraint is backed by its own implicit index. Adding an explicit index to this column, however, yielded considerable query performance improvements. 

I&#039;m now more confused than I was before reading your post.

Any ideas (if you can remember back that far)?

--jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rowan,</p>
<p>Comment on a very old post&#8230;</p>
<p>I have the opposite situation. From within pgAdmin, I can see a unique constraint, but *not* a unique index. However, it seems the constraint is backed by its own implicit index. Adding an explicit index to this column, however, yielded considerable query performance improvements. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m now more confused than I was before reading your post.</p>
<p>Any ideas (if you can remember back that far)?</p>
<p>&#8211;jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

